Architecture, Women and History in Saudi Arabia Essay

Architecture, Women and History in Saudi Arabia - Essay Example The Kingdom Centre is the property of Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, a prince of the Saudi royal family. Kingdom Centre is situated in Al-Urubah Road between King Fahd Road and Olaya Street in the growing business district of Olaya in Riyadh. In 2002 Kingdom Centre won the Emporis Skyscraper Award and was selected as the "best new skyscraper of the year for design and functionality. The three-level shopping center, which also won a major design award, fills the east wing. The large opening is illuminated at night in continuously changes colors. Besides the shopping mall, the Centre also includes a Four Seasons Hotel and state-of-the-art apartments. The ellipse motif taken from the tower's footprint appears in the light fixtures, ceiling panels, entrance canopy, wastebaskets, and furniture. The Shopping Mall contains 161 prestigious stores. The Al Faisaliyah Center was the first skyscraper constructed in Saudi Arabia, and the second tallest building in the country after the Al-Mamlakah . The golden ball constructed atop the tower is said to be inspired by a ballpoint pen. Inside the ball is a restaurant; at ground level, a shopping center with major world brands. This research project aims to put into context the role of women in Saudi and relating it to general history of the female of the west. Perceiving modern Saudi Arabian architecture and the significance of our visual perception to gender codification is what this historical project attempts to analyse. As gathered by word of the mouth, visual reception of the external shape or architecture of the two building is perceived publicly as food items, namely, a bottle opener and a toothpick. Public opinion as defined by Hegel is: "The formal subjective freedom of individuals consists in their having and expressing their private judgments, opinions, and recommendations on affairs of the state. This freedom is collectively manifested as what is called "public opinion," in which what is absolutely universal, the substantive and the true, is linked with its opposite, the purely particular and private opinions of the Many. Public opinion as it exists is thus a standing self-contradiction, knowledge is thus as appearances, the essential just as directly present as the inessential" 1 Pubic opinion, inspite of being inessential and self-contradictory, is of cultural significance. This expression which presents the essential and the rational reflects a genuine need for correct tendencies in common life in a form of common sense (Hegel: 1952:104). In this context, the sign signifying and pointing to the signified is an indication of a primary concern and at the same time leaves a lot to imagination. In his argument, Hegel also points to the origin of the human desires of enslaving as primarily due to the need for food and sex. In this primary culture one of the Hegelian parameters has dominated the perception of the two buildings. The other parameter is the object of this study. What is the importance of the other Hegelian parameter of desire in reference to this project The role of the feminine is an indication

Negative effects of technology in education Research Paper

Negative effects of technology in education - Research Paper Example One of the most fundamental golden rules that have to be observed when using technology in education is that moderation is everything and this is because of the fact that technology can easily be overused within the classroom, and this can cause a negative effect on the entire learning experience. It is true that some of these effects are already being seen from student texting and internet usage during class and there are also increased prevalence of plagiarism for coursework and general deficiency of respect for accurate language usage particularly when writing essays. This is a clear indicator of the consequences that technology usually has on the intellectual abilities of the current generation and is a display of the overall power of the internet. According to David Gelernter, â€Å"computers are our worst educational nightmares come true.† While it is a fact that independent thought has greatly been encouraged through the reading of books and has ensured the development of new ideas, this ability would be immensely diminished if there were no books in the world because it is only through the study of old ideas that new ideas are developed. Technology that is used in education, such as the internet will inevitably lead to the extinction of books from the education system because it is the source of plenty of information. However, despite the large reserves of information within this technology, the internet does not have the qualities which books have because most of the information gotten from it is often instant and shallow. The internet does not allow individuals to contemplate on the information which they have just received, as books do and the lack of independent thought because of the absence of books is likely to put the human race into a dark age of intellectual stagnation. The ability to think through the study of the previous work of scholars is what has helped the academic advancement of many children in the past and the inability to thi nk and the reliance on shallow sources of information such as the internet is likely to see the end of the academic system as we know it. Students are able to learn about their past from books and with this knowledge, the take action to avoid the mistakes of their past. The use of technology in education has to be moderated because it is a fact that books have been and still are the most credible source of academic information for centuries, and without books, one would conclude that there can be no history. Gelenter further states that â€Å"teaching children to understand the orderly unfolding of a plot or argument is a critical part of education and this is why the study of stories and arguments is only possible through books and because of the developing lack of interest in them, slowly but surely, students are likely to end up without a culture of analyzing their environment. This can clearly be seen when most of the children today prefer watching television, playing video gam es and even social networking on the internet to having intellectual discussions. The power of the media has become so great that many students in the education system do not have the will, or the inclination, to live a different sort of life. When individual students are asked what they learned